Thursday, 28 February 2013

INDIAN MUSLIMS: BABAR OR RAM? By: Francois Gautier

This is one of the finest analysis and direct descriptions of the role that Indian Muslims play in every attempt to destroy Hindu populations in India.  What can Indian Muslims do to better themselves rather than spending their lives killing and destroying the holy places of other indegenous peoples?  How can Muslims coexist rather than causing others to cease to exist?  Francois Gautier addresses this issue in the following article:

 

 Indian Muslims are today at a crossroad. The bombs attacks in Hyderabad, may have been guided by Pakistan, but could not have happened – like all recent Islamic attacks on India – without the strong support and involvement of Indian Muslims. Once again, we see that the silent Muslim majority of India – remains silent. Instead of universally condemning violence agai...nst their motherland, India.

The question that Indian Muslims should ask themselves now is simple: “who are we” ? Amongst the 120 millions of Muslims in India, only a tiny percentage descends from the Turks, Afghans, or Iranians who invaded India. The majority of them are converted Muslims. And converted how ? By terror, coercion, force, bloodshed. The ancestors of today’s Indian Muslims are probably those who suffered the most from the Arab and Muslim invasions. Those Hindus and Sikhs who chose not to convert, took refuge in their faith, fought together and kept their pride and honor. The first two generations of those who converted must have endured hell: for they certainly did not convert out of conviction, but because they had no choice: their daughters and wives were raped, sons taken into slavery, parents killed. It is sad today that their descendants have sometimes made theirs the intolerant cry of Islam.

Do Indian Muslims understand that they were part of the richest, most advanced, most tolerant and generous civilization of ancient times. That their culture was so advanced that it had spread all over the world ?Do they realize that more and more archeological an historical discoveries are pointing out that the genocide of Hindus by Muslim invaders is without parallel. The conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000, was followed by the annihilation of the entire Hindu population there; indeed, the region is still called Hindu Kush, 'Hindu slaughter'. The Bahmani sultans in central India, made it a rule to kill 100.000 Hindus a year. In 1399, Teimur killed 100.000 Hindus in a single day. Professor K.S. Lal has estimated that the Hindu population decreased by 8O million between the year 1000 and 1525, probably the biggest holocaust in history. Surely, many of present day Indian Muslims’ ancestors must have been among those slaughtered.

Islam cannot be wished away. As Sri Aurobindo said “Mahomed's mission was necessary, else we might have ended by thinking, in the exaggeration of our efforts at self-purification, that earth was meant only for the monk and the city created as a vestibule for the desert”…. . Thus Indian Muslims have to keep their faith and any attempt by Hindus to convert them back is not only futile but counterproductive. But the question to be asked to them is: “what kind of Islam do you want to practice ? An Islam which looks westwards, towards a foreign city, the Mecca, swears by a Scripture, the Koran, which is not only not relevant to India, but which was meant for people living 1500 years ago, in a language which is not Indian ? Or do they want to practice an Islam which is “Indianized”, which accepts the reality of other Gods, as Hinduism and Buddhism accept that there have been other avatars than Ram or Buddha.

Do India Muslims want to worship Babar, a man who destroyed everything which was good, beautiful and holy and lived by the power of violence, or do they want to imbibe the qualities of Ram, who believed in the equality of all, who gave-up all riches and honors of the world because he thought his brother deserved the throne more than him ?
Whatever the West says, which is obsessed with China, India, a vibrant, English speaking, pro-western democracy is going to become the superpower of the 21st century. Do Indian Muslims want to participate in that great adventure ? Do they want to feel that they are part of India, that they are
Indians ?

Nowadays it is politically not correct to say anything against Islam. You are immediately labeled anti-Muslim and dismissed as a “rightist”. No matter if you are only reporting the fact that there is a real problem with Islam in South Asia: that India is surrounded by fundamentalists states: Afghanistan and Pakistan, while more moderates like Bangladesh, tend to close an eye to anti-Indian activities; that Indian Muslims sometimes tend to put their religion before their country; and that Kashmiris, far from being the persecuted that the Foreign Press likes to portray, are actually paying the price for having allowed Afghan and Pakistani Sunnis radicalize what used to be a more gentle and tolerant Islam and left their Hindu brothers and sisters being butchered and chased away from their ancestral land.

Thus the question has to be asked again: do Indian Muslims want to be like Babar or like Ram? This choice will shape their future for generations to come. It is maybe only in India, that Islam can come to terms with itself and accept the reality of other faiths. Otherwise, if it continues on the path of confrontation, not only in India, but with the whole western world, it is surely going towards self-destruction.
 
Zemira Eli Natan
Executive Director
International Unity for Equality
 

Tuesday, 26 February 2013

Download Cartoons and Books From Our Site

Visitors of IUFE are requested to click on this page to download various items : Soon we will be delivering tons of cartoons, books, fliers and posters on our downloads page.  Stay  tuned with us. 

Click On This Link : DOWNLOADS 

The Current Face Islamization and Jihad in India By: Achintya Sundar Das and Zemira Eli Natan





"I am a Bangladeshi hindu , from last four hour bangladesh is on riot . 8.5 % Hindu here and muslim killing and destroy houses and temple . Please save Bangladeshi Hindus!"
 
BREAKING NEWS AS THE TERROR CONTINUES AND MANY MORE INNOCENT PEOPLE ARE NEEDLESSLY MURDERED!



CURRENT UPDATE FROM BANGLADESH ON DESTRUCTION OF HOLY SHRINE!









The International Community is put on notice to recognize the following facts and issues that are effecting India currently and also the points in history that have led to the current situation in India and Pakistan.  We are relating the Hindu experience versus the Historical and ongoing demand of Muslims to date.  In 1923-1924 what was known as British India Muslims had no leadership and had a population of about 17- 20%.  At this point in history Muslims in India started a movement to create a Muslim nation separate from India.  The early 20’s witnessed the emergence of Muslim Nationalism. Under the Muslim leadership of that time the concept of Pakistan was born as a proposed state for Indian Muslims.  Pakistan was formed on the basis that India was not meeting the needs of Indian Muslims. The peak level of the popularity of this movement occurred between 1945-1946.   The region known as undivided Bengal is now two thirds of what we now know of as Bangladesh, a Muslim territory currently and one third is now West Bengal.   The important thing to understand is that Muslims took this land and occupied it.  They also took the entire area of Sindh which is located in Pakistan.  The Northwest Frontier Province was occupied by Pakistan and also Pakistan occupied Kashmir. During the partition, there was a Muslim majority in these states which became the Pakistan movement As we all know, Pakistan (what was known as West Pakistan before the creation of Bangladesh) resides in extreme western part of India. And Bangladesh (what was known as East Pakistan before its liberation from the Pakistani occupier) is situated in the extreme east, so there is no road in between India and Pakistan.   It was a very painful situation for Pakistan to handle both of the two territories. Pakistan (West Pakistan) used to send their troops by plane or via ship to Bangladesh (East Pakistan). Also, families of both of the two territories of Pakistan used to have relatives in these two areas.  They were facing big problems in order to reach and communicate easily.  After the creation of Pakistan, within some months Muslim leaders started demanding a corridor or road between the two territories through Indian soil. India opposed that demand strongly and openly said we will never give you any corridor joining these two territories.  Pakistan initiated a plan and programme in the mind of remaining Indian Muslims those started living in India after the formation of  Pakistan that increased the population in the areas such as West Bengal, Assam, Northeast, Uttar Pradesh touching the border area of Nepal, Bhutan and joined it with Kashmir in order to force the granting of  our demand. That old demand is now a bitter truth in India. The way they are increasing the Muslim population currently is the same way they will do it within 30 years.

http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/news/200-houses-burnt-in-bengal-village-by-mob-protesting-cleric-s-death/265680?v_also_see

http://www.ndtv.com/article/south/hyderabad-serial-blasts-at-least-15-dead-50-injured-333875

http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/news/now-a-jihad-for-love/109692


MAJOR PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES:

 1) Terrorist Attacks and Riots in every part of India.

 2) Love Jihad & Conversion of Non Muslims in Islam.

 3) Expulsion of Hindus from Muslim ghettos and Forced   Conversion.

 4) Muslims doesn't respect the law of the country, though the Indian government openly says we share equality under the law and the principle of we two ours two. We two ours two is a term that means every couple should take maximum of two children. Where an average Muslim couple has minimum 6-7 children, sometimes you will see 15 children of one Muslim couple. So that means Muslims do not follow family planning in a way that they can support their families.

 5) India is secular country and the government encourages that a person should marry only woman, but Muslims do not practice this.  Instead, they practice Sharia.  The Indian government has given up just to  avoid civil war and loss of lives and property of non muslims.  The Indian government supports this very wrong political move.

 6) Muslims of India are destroying Hindu shrines, temples in every part of this country.

 7) The mainstream media is useless since they claim that if we show the truth about the current violence that is occurring in India that Muslims will start rioting, so it’s simply better to appease Muslims and avoid the interests of non Muslims.

 8) Muslims of India have never followed modern education and they will never follow it.

 9) Muslims practices SHARIAH and MADRASAH EDUCTAION, and it is becoming a threat now. Already in India Muslims made demands for a compulsory education in all government institutions and some secular government educational institutions already started its operation India.

 10) India is a secular country so there should not be any use of religion to control the policy of the country. But in many states like West Bengal , the Andhra Pradesh government started offering jobs to Muslims on reservation and quota basis avoiding other true minority communities like Parsis, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, Sri Lankan Tamils, and Bangladeshi refugees.  Many are considered they less important minorities for acknowledgement by the government.

11) The demand of Muslims are already met everywhere and all political parties of India are now a puppet of Muslim Militants. Now the government of India wants communal harmony of Muslims and non Muslims at any cost by sacrificing non Muslim interests and only offering for Muslim interests. It is just like a nightmare in a secular democratic structure, though officially India is known as a secular country but the reality is that it is not.

 12) Infiltration of foreigners like Pakistanis and Bangladeshis through Indo-Bangladesh and Indo-Pak border is happening in full swing and they are converting the  border districts of India into a Muslim majority.

 13) DGFI, ISI, AL QAEDA and Communists have a lobby to dismantle India.

14) Muslims offer Azaan in the streets of many big cities and block the road by just breaking the traffic rules of this country. Police just does the opposite thing without arresting them. They provide them security and harass the non Muslims if they ask about it.

 15) The Congress Government created a communal violence bill which is just a communal bill The bill says if there is any riot found in India then Hindus will be accountable for it. As they form majority in this country so it is their duty to maintain peace and integrity. But unfortunately we know who is actually accountable for violating human rights and peace in this country.

 16) After the creation of India, Pakistan always tried to dismantle this country by promoting terror with their hundreds of organizations like LET, JAIS E MUHHAMAD, AL QAEADA PAKISTAN UNIT HUJI AND INDIAN Mujahedeen are also working in Bangladesh and India for the same cause.

 17) Muslims of India get study loans with a lower interest rates, and they get discount  of flight fare when thy go to attend the Hajj in Saudi Arabia with the hardly paid tax dollars of Hindus and others in India. Muslims live on the welfare of India State's money but they don't abide by the law of this country.

 18) A silent form of job jihad, media jihad, food jihad and clinical jihad is going on in India most of the people are not aware about this in India.

 19) Indian government is highly careful to protect radical people like Asauddin Oaisi and Akbaruddin Oaisi , Zakir Naik, Moulana Madani and many people who propagate hatred, hate speech, and the end of secularism in India whereas the government refuses to provide security and visas to people like Salman Rushdie and Taslima Nasreen. It clearly proves that India is a Pseudo secular state

 20) Organizations like Simi( Student Islamic movement India) , MIM, ALL INDIA MINORITY FORUM , MUSLIM LEAGUE ARE RISING EVERYWHERE with more radical demands in India.

 21) Already some states are having civil war in India in the absence of mainstream media for high Muslim populations like West Bengal, Assam, UP, Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala and in thousands of Muslim ghettos sharing the same problem especially the big cities.

Zemira Eli Natan
Executive Director
International Unity for Equality

Achintya Sundar Das
Administrative Director
International Unity for Equality




Monday, 25 February 2013

Terry Jones on Obama and the Second Amendment: TIME TO RESIST! TIME FOR A REVOLUTION!



“I do believe that, where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence.”
 – Mahatma Ghandi

We must resist the direction the Obama administration is leading America. We must not give up our constitutional rights. We must not go the way of England and Germany. It's time to take a stand against those that would choose to enslave us with laws that violate our rights and liberties, even to the point of bloodshed.

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
- Thomas Jefferson


Thank you,
Dr. Terry Jones
Stand Up America Now
Source : http://www.standupamericanow.org

COMMENTS BY SHRI N.S. RAJARAM ON HYDERABAD BOMB BLASTS BY N.S. RAJARAM

Following massive loss of life and property in Hyderabad blast, it has come to light that some Indian Mujahideen operatives had reconnoitered the Dilsukhnagar  area of Hyderabad in December 2012. Obviously they didn't do this because  they planned to hold a picnic.

This information was given to the Home Ministry by an IM operative who was in custody. This information should have been given immediately to the local authorities and the media and the public also alerted if necessary.

But what does the Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde do? He sends everyone on a wild goose chase by raising the bogey of 'Hindu terror' that creates unnecessary turmoil obscuring the looming real threat. The IM itself could not have done a better job of creating such a diversion throwing the security agencies, the media and the public off guard!

I don't for a moment believe that Shinde was acting on his own. He is a total nonentity (like Pratibha Patil) owes his position to the patronage of 10 Janpath. He has never held any responsible position for any length of time. His 'Hindu terror' was an echo of what Rahul told the U.S. ambassador in private. It is part of an elaborate charade to divert attention from the threat of Islamic terrorism by creating diversions
.
This suggests there are forces in 10 Janpath and its liaison of NAC (under Sonia G) that are engaged in massive disinformation campaign that willingly or unwitting serving the interests of terrorist
organizations.

Recall that when UPA I came to power, Sonia Gandhi along with Salman Khurshid had the ban lifted on SIMI declaring it was not a terrorist organization. But the Supreme Court reimposed the ban.
Following this, Rahul Gandhi, now Shinde and others have started this 'Hindu terror' campaign.

What is needed is a series of meetings of knowledgeable experts -- not hare-brained, effete cowards like Rahul and his chelas -- nationwide discussing policy options and public involvement.

Let us face this reality: India is engaged in a war against an enemy that is employing irregular methods. This is not a law enforcement problem, because they do not recognize any law other than the Sharia as legitimate. We need to define the rules of engagement in dealing with this situation. Their goal is to overthrow the state and install a government ruled by Shariat.

Let us organize a meeting of interested, competent, knowledgeable people. I am in touch with experts in the U.S. and can share some information

Source : Narain Kataria

IUFE Alliance With Right Wing Death Bogan



IUFE Alliance With  Right Wing Death Bogan 



IUFE WELCOMES RIGHT WING DEATH BOGAN  A STRONG RIGHT WING GROUP  TAKING THE ACTION FOR OUR COMMON CAUSE AGAINST THE SPREAD OF EXTREMISM. WE LOOK FORWARD TO A LONG ENDURING PARTNERSHIP IN OUR MUTUAL GOALS.



Zemira Eli Natan
Executive Director
International Unity for Equality




 

Canning Riots 2013: Persecution of Hindus In West Bengal & Other Anti Hindu Riots in India


A Pogrom of Yesteryear – A depiction of Hep-Hep Riots, Frankfurt, 1819
A Pogrom of Yesteryear – A depiction of Hep-Hep Riots, Frankfurt, 1819

Hindus are protesting In front of TMC Party office in New Delhi 





Ex BJP President Tathagato Roy  of West Bengal Visited The Riot Affected Place In Naliakhari Canning,West Bengal,India 
Canning, West Bengal India : The Canning Riots took place in Canning in the Indian State of West Bengal on 19 February 2013. (1) It is clear from the reports that the motivation for what was effectively a kind of pogrom was religious intolerance.  The reports create a similar picture to the Hepp-Hepp Riots (2) against Jews in Frankfurt in 1819 that is depicted in the picture above.  An article on the website of Organiser (3) a well-established newspaper opens as follows in relation to the events in Canning:

 "“A well organised and meticulously planned attack on Hindus unleashed havoc in different parts of Naliakhari area under Canning PS in the South 24 Paraganas district of West Bengal on 19/02/13.”



It went on to suggest a definite religious motivation for the acts of violence and disorder that took place.  The article goes on to report about the looting, the arson, the wilful destruction of property, and the desecration of temples and religious idols.  It referred to inaction on the part of police who were on the scene and the silence of much of the established media.  The reaction of the authorities and the press shows much similarity to what often happens in Western countries.  Read the Organiser article HERE.
NDTV reported that as many as 200 homes had been burnt down during the riots. (4) Struggle for Hindu Existence (5) reported on a subsequent demonstration that took place in Delhi to protest about the events in Canning.  Video from the aftermath of the riots can be found on the Struggle for Hindu Existence website (6) together with an English language transcript. The following is the video:
These riots come as Islamists lobby for a second partition of India to create an Islamic super state called Mughalistan that would incorporate Pakistan, Bangladesh and a swathe of territory currently part of India that would physically join Pakistan together with Bangladesh. BengalGenocide.com shows a map that illustrates the geographical form that Mughalistan, would take. (7)  Of course the creation of Mughalistan would be nothing more than a religiously inspired land grab.
It could be argued that what is happening in places like Canning is attempted ethnic cleansing of the Hindu populations to make way for the dream of Mughalistan.  Government response to ethnic cleansing should be firm but it would appear that the state government of West Bengal is being very casual in its response.  The response of the authorities to the Canning Riots in 2013, seems to be very similar the attitude of authorties with regard to the Hepp-Hepp Riots in 19th Century Frankfurt.  Perhaps the authorities have a hidden agenda of their own?
The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) of course has been remarkably silent about the religious persecution evident in the 2013 Canning Riots.  The OIC it must be remembered is supposed to be the conscience of the world when it comes to standing up to religious intolerance.  The reality of course it that OIC talk about religious freedom is nothing more than the total freedom that they want to expand the reach of the unjust and iniquitous system known as sharia law.  Of course it is likely that the OIC is more excited by the prospect of a Mughalistan than it is about the suffering of Hindus and their right to peace, security, and dignity.
The International Civil Liberties Alliance (ICLA) calls upon to Government of the State of West Bengal and the National Government of India to act to prevent the persecution of Hindu’s in West Bengal.  ICLA also calls upon the OIC to demonstrate its sincerity with regard to protecting religious freedoms.  It could do this by condemning the actions of those who attacked the Hindus of Canning.  If the OIC is unable to do this then it is quite clear that the OIC is not interested in religious freedom and that its efforts in the United Nations and elsewhere are merely a sham intended only to expand the reach of sharia.
(1) 2013 Canning riots (Wikipedia)
(2) Hepp-Hepp Riots (Wikipedia)
(6) Video Footage (Struggle for Hindu Existence)
(7) Mughalistan (BengalGenocide.com)
(8) ICLA
(14) IUFE




(24) Malabar Rebellion

(25) Godhra Train Burning

 SOURCE:  Noisyroom, Hindu Existence & ICLA


Sunday, 24 February 2013

INDIA: Bonded labour in India A Shocking Story

INDIA: Bonded labour in India

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 30, 2010 
ALRC-CWS-15-12-2010 

Language(s): English only 

HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL 
Fifteenth session, Agenda Item 4
A written statement submitted by the Asian Legal Resource Centre (ALRC), a non-governmental organisation with general consultative status
INDIA: Bonded labour in India

Bonded labour is prohibited in India by law. Though the Constitution directly and indirectly prohibits the practice, vide Articles 21, 23 (1) and 24, a specific law that prohibits the practice, the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act was legislated only in 1976. Despite the statutory prohibition, bonded labour is widely practiced. The worst affected are the children, particularly those from the Dalit community. The practice is so prevalent in the country, that even a village in Uttar Pradesh state, Bandhua, literally meaning bonded, is named after the practice. 

Bonded labour is known in different names in the country. In the farming sector it is known as Hali in Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh; Kaimuti, Janouri, Kamiah and others in Bihar; Gothi in Orissa; Gassi-Gullu in Andhra Pradesh; and Panal Pathiran in Tamilnadu. The practice exists in non-framing sectors like the Devadasi practice of bonded sex workers; and in small-scale industries like firecracker, textile, leather goods manufacturing sectors, brick and tile kilns and granite extraction industries. The most affected by bonded labour in the non-farming industries are the children. There is no credible and collated national statistics available about the number of persons, in particular that of the children, affected by bonded labour in India. 

Bonded labour in the farming sector is mostly due to caste-based prejudices practiced against the Dalit communities and due to the absence of a proper land reforms policy. In states like Kerala, where land reforms has been implemented by statute since the past four decades, bonded labour virtually has been eliminated as opposed to states like Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Tamilnadu and Karnataka where large extents of lands are still held by families that practice feudal forms of land ownership and labour employment. 

Owing to the lack of livelihood options, large number of rural population are forced to work for landlords and eventually end up in perpetual debt traps resulting in entire families and villages ending up as bonded to the landlord for generations. The absence of functioning public health facilities and education opportunities literally push the rural population to work either as bonded labourers or to migrate into urban areas seeking odd jobs. 

A large number of children employed as bonded labourers by the non-farming sectors like small-scale textile, firecracker, leather goods manufacturing, brick kilns and granite extraction units are from the families who are subjected to distress migration from the rural villages. In the cities, children from these families are employed as bonded labourers in restaurants and eateries or end up employed as bonded beggars or fall prey to sex trade. 

Red light areas in cities like Mumbai and Varanasi have thousands of such children, male and female, from far-flung areas of the country and from neighbouring countries like Nepal and Bhutan. Owing to widespread corruption within the law enforcement agencies and their close nexus with city based criminal gangs engaged in human trafficking, rescuing the children fallen prey to human trafficking is literally impossible. Human rights defenders like Mr. Ajeet Singh of Guria in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh state and Ms. Hasina Kharbhih of Impulse NGO Network of Shillong, Meghalaya state are threatened by these gangs whenever they engage in rescue operations. 

In addition to the domestic distress migration from rural villages to cities forming the never ending supply chain of bonded labourers in Indian cities, in Meghalaya state, extraction of coal in private coal mines in the Jaintiya hills region is exclusively undertaken by manual labourers, thousands of them bonded, who have come to work in the mines from neighbouring Nepal and Bangladesh to beat acute poverty in their home countries. Mining is carried out using primitive tools and with hands, in hundreds of unprotected and unregulated mines, throughout the year. Of the estimated one million foreign labourers, an estimated 70,000 are children from Bangladesh and Nepal. 

The legal framework against bonded labour provided in the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 is supported by other legislations like the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; the Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979; the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Yet the practice continues unabated in India due to the failure in the implementation of the laws. 

The Ministry of Labour, Government of India had initiated a Centrally Sponsored Scheme under which Rs. 20,000 is provided for the rehabilitation of each bonded labourer, to be equally contributed by the Federal and the State government. But, by and large, the process of rehabilitation is frequently delayed, particularly in the case of inter-state bonded migrant labourers, and the degree of concerted convergent action required on the part of the administration is rarely forthcoming. Prosecution of employers is also weak. Since the bonded labourers are very poor and asset less, most of them relapse into bondage, while others experience only a very marginal increase in income. The financial assistance from the government, even if realized, in the absence of any additional support mechanism for a released and asset less labourer is not sufficient support to start a new life. However increasing the quantum of the support amount is not a viable solution. Instead to end the practice what is required is the strict implementation of labour laws in India. 

Internationally supported programmes for the elimination of bondage are few, with the exception of a number of initiatives for elimination of child labour. Since June 2000, the ILO has been implementing a project to prevent and eliminate bonded labour in South Asia. In India, the project has been operational in Rangareddy district of Andhra Pradesh and Tiruvallur district of Tamil Nadu. 

Bonded labour must be addressed starting from the premise that lack of access of the poorest households to appropriate financial services is one of the causes of bonded labour. Preventive efforts must recognize the social dimensions of bondage, and thereby address it through public sensitisation and rights awareness, adult literacy, organising workers, income generation and vocational skills development. The strategies to eliminate bonded labour need to go beyond the symptoms to address the root causes (labour market segmentation, entrenched social discrimination, lack of financial services, lack of outreach of social partners in the informal economy). The multifaceted and deeply rooted nature of those causes requires an integrated and long-term strategy. 

When designing interventions, a clear distinction must be drawn between 'severe' and 'mild' forms of bonded labour, the latter being more suited to specific micro-finance based solutions, which would be inappropriate for the former. The broad linkages between bonded labour systems, production structures and the pattern of development need to be better understood since the roots of bondage are related to factors such as production technologies on the one hand, and economic vulnerability and structural inequality, on the other. Long-term development and land reform measures along with poverty alleviation and social security are pathways out of bondage. 

Finally, the persistence of bondage is a consequence of weak enforcement of labour laws and the laws of the land. India has a plethora of labour legislation regulating the conditions of work of contract and migrant labour, prohibiting child labour in hazardous industries, and for minimum wages. But these remain in large part unimplemented. More significantly, in case after case, there is violation of the fundamental human rights of workers, which are enshrined in the Constitution. A concerted effort to ensure implementation of the law, by government in close cooperation with employers' and workers' organisations and civil society, is called for in this respect.
# # #
About the ALRC: The Asian Legal Resource Centre is an independent regional non-governmental organisation holding general consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations. It is the sister organisation of the Asian Human Rights Commission. The Hong Kong-based group seeks to strengthen and encourage positive action on legal and human rights issues at the local and national levels throughout Asia.

Source : www.humanrights.asia and ALRC 


Achintya Das ( Administrative Director )
International Unity For Equality

In India, Google Funds Campaign Against Bonded Labor By Betwa Sharma

DELHI — This week, five non-governmental organizations here launched a national campaign against bonded labor called “Bandhua 1947.”
Activists say that millions of Indian laborers are trapped in a cycle of debt, which leaves them at the mercy of their employers. These laborers spend their lives working in brick kilns, rock quarries, rice mills, farms, and beedi factories. They do not have the knowledge or resources to leave or demand recognition of basic rights. The Bonded Labour System Abolition Act, 1976 which should protect them is not enforced.
Activists also say that it is difficult to pin down the number of bonded laborers in India because people are constantly on the move to find work across different states. Employers are also able to cleverly disguise their criminal activity. Human Rights Watch estimates India has 40 million bonded laborers.
“The issue  and related advocacy work is so deep that any substantive work would require resources far in excess of [what's] currently available,” said Sandeep Chachra, head of ActionAid India, an NGO involved in the campaign.
SmartPlanet spoke with Saju Mathew, head of operations for the International Justice Mission in South Asia, about funding and objectives of the campaign.
SP: How are the NGOs funding this campaign?
SM: Google is the key funder for the campaign. This particular campaign is something that Google had said they wanted to engage in because they understood the problem of trafficking.
SP: How much money is Google giving?
SM: This campaign is about $4.5 million to be used over three years.
SP: What’s the plan of action for three years?
SM: What we’re trying to do is to highlight that the problem of bonded labor is a nation-wide problem. And it’s something that can also be solved. It doesn’t have to seem overwhelming.
Wherever we’re working, across a dozen different states, we’re trying to mobilize the victimized population so that they would ask for more protection of their rights, educate the government and ask the government to identify and rescue more people who are trapped in bonded labor. We’re trying to find a way for the central government to help push the states to strengthen their approach to it.
SP: How will the money be used?
SM: The majority of the money goes towards doing trainings and educating, mobilizing and gathering information and rescues.
SP: Is 4.5 million a significant amount?
SM: For Google, it’s certainly not. I know that when they do campaigns to educate people on medical issues and HIV, it’s significantly more. So in some ways, it’s a fairly small amount because what we’re talking about is to reach the entire nation on a budget like that.
SP: How is bonded labor today different from feudal bonded labor?
SM: A long time ago bonded labor was that there was a landlord–he was a powerful person, owned the land and then people lived on the land but they could only work for this land. Landlord set all the terms and conditions of their employment. They were bonded to this land.
Now what we find is people that are in the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe communities, because of poverty and just difficult situations, they need jobs. So the owners give an advance of money upfront. A lot of times the advance goes towards a need like paying a hospital bill.
Overtime what they find is that they are not getting paid what they think they were. And the owners say that half the income is being put towards your advance. But they don’t give them enough to survive. So they are always struggling.
So they have to borrow a little bit more, a little bit more. Because the owner controls all the terms of their life, they cannot find a way to get out of this debt. It is very common for us to find someone who said I borrowed Rs. 2000, Rs. 3000 and now owe Rs 16,000.
SP: Can they run away?
SM: Sometimes people run away so the owners will go to their village, track them and bring them back. And then they say the car, the vehicles, all it took me to track adds on to the debt.
Because the laborers are uneducated, they don’t know if it’s funny math or legitimate. The debt or advance is just like bait if you’re trying to catch the fish. Only once the fish takes the bait do they realize that they see there is a hook. The laborers can’t leave until they pay off the advance. They can’t work anywhere else. Well that’s illegal. That’s bonded labor.
SP: A lot of companies have exclusive contracts. What makes this bonded labor?
SM: The reason that they do this is because . . . [this] form of giving in advance and telling people that their freedoms are restricted has been a tactic used by people in a wealthy position to take advantage of the poor. So the Bonded Labor Act is devised to make sure that this kind of scheme is not perpetrated.
There may be businesses that engage in contracts and requirements but there is a bartering, there is a give and take, there is legality to it. Here there is just one side setting all the terms. People don’t lock you up in a place, make you live there, work there and don’t pay you any real proper wages. That whole restriction takes it out of the ambit of contracts at a corporate level. And the difference in disparity, the power differential is also a factor.
SP:  What happens after you rescue people?
SM: We (IJM) go in with the government and when they are rescued, we have social workers that immediately begin to develop a relationship to get to know them. And then we take them back, almost the same day generally, to their native place. If they don’t have a place or home, we give them temporary structures, food provisions that last about a week or so and then we give them tool kits so that they can get some job right away.
We have a two year aftercare program. The primary thrust of that are regular visits to their homes. We go and visit them. We make sure their children are in school, we help them find jobs, and we connect them with self-help groups. We try to do counseling. We start bank accounts. We find that 95% of people who we’ve rescued out are safe and do not return to bonded labor after two years.
The other thing we do is work with the prosecutor’s office to file a criminal complaint.
SP: In your experience is criminal action taken?
SM: I would say in the last 10 years, having done around 150 or so cases, we’ve seen conviction in about a handful.  They tend to be for one day in jail, and a few, six months to a year.
SP: Does the existing law on bonded labor need to be changed?
SM: The main thing we are recommending is enforcement of the existing law. The Supreme Court has recently handed down a judgment that says bonded labor is rampant. You can find almost no convictions in the entire country on bonded labor. How can you not convict an individual who is trafficking and stealing the life of another human being and using them as a piece of property and then robbing the children of education so that they don’t have much options so their future also looks like bonded laborer?
The criminal conviction of this issue is going to be the easiest and most direct deterrent. What we’re trying to do is really educate the government so that they would file FIRs on time, [and] the police would investigate these in a timely basis. All of those training have to happen.
SP:  Why hasn’t this happened so far?
SM: I don’t know. I don’t know what the political will is, what the prioritization of this is. I think some of it is confusion because people say I don’t know what’s wrong with it – they have to work, he is giving them a job, they borrowed money.
But only when you come closer do you realize that these people are not free. That they get beaten. That women often complain of sexual molestation. Children are not allowed to go free. So if you look from here, it just looks like a place of business because they don’t have to use chains and fences. A proactive step of going and identifying this more closely, that’s what really needs to happen.
SP: Would the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, which provides 100 days of work in a year, play a part in controlling this?
SM: What NREGA tells people is that there is a guaranteed job. If you need a job, come to us. If you need money, come to us. So it stops the flow of employers having this almost carte-blanche full hand on getting the laborers.
SP: Have you set some targets for the next three years?

SM: We’re still too early in that process. We’re talking to different ministries and mapping out the various government bodies that would be the best for it. Our hope is that by the beginning of 2013, we’d be able to have our objectives outlined and defined and all the different NGOs would be on board.



Source : www.smartplanet.com




Achintya Das ( Administrative Director )
International Unity For Equality