Veerji Kolhi A Social Activist: Attack on Hindus prompts blasphemy case in Pakista...

Veerji Kolhi A Social Activist: Attack on Hindus prompts blasphemy case in Pakista...: Police officer Mohammad Hanif said Muslims protesting an anti-Islam film on Sept. 21 ransacked the Sri Krishna Ram temple in a Hindu neig...

Veerji Kolhi A Social Activist: Can Mother Teresa, a non-Muslim, go to heaven??? ...

Veerji Kolhi A Social Activist: Can Mother Teresa, a non-Muslim, go to heaven??? ...: The recent killings of Shias and blasphemy charges against a young Christian girl  are not a product of some foreign militant group terro...

How Will The Condition of Remaining Afghan Hindus & Sikhs Be After 2014 After Withdrawal of NATO & USA Troops From Afghanistan By Fagirchand Chandihok

Fagirchand Chandihok

According to my information from more then one hundred thousands Afghan Hindus and Sikhs now the numbers of remaining are around two thousands,which mainly live in Kabul ,few families in Jalalabad and other parts of the country.After fall of Islamic Taliban regime in Kabul there was hope in different parts of Afghan people for positive change in this country.

For Hindus and Sikhs from beginning of new era was hopeless. Because in Bonn conference representatives of Afghan Hindus and Sikhs are not invited and were ignored totally,
and then the name of new regime in Kabul was Islamic republic which automatically discriminated the Afghan Hindus and Sikhs .Hindus are the oldest people of this country from Vedic and Buddhist period before invasion of this country by Islam.
New Afghan constitution  declared Islam is the only official state religion not any law which contradicts Islam will not recognise and any non interpreted part of constitution will be explained only in a way of Islam.The president of the country can be only Muslim. Also their are  many more articles in this constitution which are true discrimination against the non Muslim minorities of the country.Suppose many parts of Islamic Sharia law and Islamic Blasphemy law which truly discriminates against the non Muslims.

It's unbelievable such kind of Constitution which dpes not reconize the rights of minorities has been push by UN ,USA and EU Countries which is contradicts the declaration of Human rights of Geneva convention. The rights of the Religious minorities is put in political deal in relation to depth of religious fundamentalism in Afghan society and Afghan neighbour's countries like Islamic Pakistan and Islamic Iran.

Afghan refugee are returning back to their country especially from Iran & Pakistan. But even single Afghan Hindu and Sikh is not return to their country within last ten years beside of involuntary deportation from western countries which they also escape to India.This all above give the idea that the present social & political situation is not suitable for Afghan Hindus and Sikhs.

American media & high rank of leading persons from EU told many times ,after withdraw of foreign forces from this country we do not have a good message of peace for Afghan people.The war probable is going to be continue in severe form and once again come the time of civil war in between different old mujaheddin groups ,which Hindus and Sikhs has been paid too much and suffered in all aspects of life and leave their homeland.From another side negotiations is going on with Taliban to bring them back to power and solve them in present regime and if Taliban joint the present government it's natural the face of current regime be come more fundamentalist rather then liberal and secular. So leaving of NATO and USA forces ,adoption of Taliban in current regime or becoming Taliban in power in their own form it's never be in favor of Hindus and Sikhs in this country.Keep in mind Pakistan & Iran are two enemy of Afghan people ,just now they are working to destabilize the Kabul regime & in different way their influence in Afghan army ,police & security forces.Minorities in both this Islamic countries especially Hindus in Pakistan are under attack to leave this country.Any influence of these countries especially Pakistan be against the Afghan Hindus and Sikhs.Living in deeply religious,overwhelmingly Muslim nation,Afghan Hindus and Sikhs have suffered their share of hardships:taunts,attacks,desecration of cremation sites,marginalization and poverty , illiteracy ,lack of security .Many possess a bottomless collection of grim tales.
Eleven years from invasion of Afghanistan by USA and NATO , the Afghan Hindus and Sikhs community decimated by emigration & remaing members desperately trying a way to leave the country & this is the only option to them.In daily life they face different type of discrimination with majority people.Just very short history :latest incidence happened in the wake of a suicide bombing in Samangan province,which killed more 20 people ,including prominant Sikh ,his body has brought to Kabul to burm the body,after cremation when the Hindus and Sikhs came back to collect the ashes villagers from majority people has thrown the stones and bricks into ashes.

The Innocence of Muslims Sparks The Whole World By Fagirchand Chandihok

Fagirchand Chandihok

In these days because of showing of trailor of film innocence of Islam and the publishing of Mohammed cartoon in french magazine ,many Islamic countries like Pakistan ,Afghanistan ,Iran and some Arab countries make demonstration against USA and Western countries ,which most of them was full of violence & the vandalise their cities & public properties ,kill dozens of their countrymen.

Mufti Azam of Egypt told in a demonstration rally that the Islamic world must act through UN to pass resolution to ban any kind of insult to Islam in all the world.

If we go to history of Islam and many versus of Qur'an Islam has done big insult to all others faiths. Now in Islamic countries the Islamic blasphemy law is in action , and just with two witenesses of Muslims can a non Muslim be punished by death penalty. It is clear to the world living non Muslims minorities in Islamic majority countries their is no equal rights to minority .In every Islamic country their is plights of minority is in practise in daily life. Discrimination and insult of minorities are very common in Muslim majority countries .Muslim countries have no rights to ask UN to pass such kind of resolution at moral ground. First Muslims countries must ban the Islamic Blasphemy law and Islamic Sharia law which is a big insult and discrimination of minorities in their own country .
.

Veerji Kolhi Social Activist Documentary on Kastori Rape Case

 

Veerji Kolhi continues to this day to fight for the Protection of Human Rights in Pakistan.  This is a documentary of one of many cases in which he is an advocate.  Such  violent acts are never acceptable in a Civil Society.  We do not discriminate against any religion in bringing these issues to the attention of the the International Community.  We are simply bringing awareness of these ongoing issues to a public who normally would have no exposure to such events outside their own homes.  We ask for justice in these matters.  Veerji Kolhi's efforts should be known as he has been successful in  bringing the perpetrators of these crimes to justice.  Thank you Veerji Kolhi, for without you these victims would have no hope and would be utterly closed off from the rest of the world who would not be able to hear their pleas for help.

Zemira Eli Natan
Executive Director
International Unity for Equality

Veerji Kohli
Social Activist
Council for the Defense
Bonded Labor

Senator Avella "offended" at Muslim Parade NYC

Every year, Muslims organize the "Muslim Parade Day" in New York to project Islam's peaceful image to Americans. This year's event was held yesterday, 23 Sept. 2012. And a promotional advertisement of the event showed the black flag of Islamic Jihad hoisted on top of the White House.
They say that everyone loves a parade!!!  But, what about  when Muslims  get up on an American stage and make demands that the UN enforce Blasphemy laws in the United States of America.   Is this US Senator offended?  Of course he is!!!!  What US Citizen would not be offended by such a demand?  Are the Muslims still crying out victim status?  For a Movie?  Yet the crimes they commitaround the world every single day still remain unnoticed by the International Human Rights Organizations such as the UN and Amnesty International, to name a few.  Silence in the world on repeated Muslim violence , but certainly New York has the time to host a Muslim Parade of Protest against a movie that they clearly could have ignored.  Is this yelling fire in a crowded room?  Not in the slightest! Should the United States of America submit to Islam?  Not in a million years!  Since when did Muslims assume a Caliphate in the USA?  I cannot recall when it could have happened!  As far as I know we as Americans still enjoy Freedom of Speech and Expression!  That is, last time I checked we did!

Zemira Eli Natan
Executive Director
International Unity for Equality

Let's Block Out the Noise!

Apparently the United States current President in  office  believes that Israel makes noise about a nuclear Iran!  This response in not unlike the one that was given when Israel warned the USA that terrorists entered the US  to carry out the 9/11 attacks!  We never seem to think that Muslims make noise when they scream about a movie being aired on You Tube or block a video that shows an exhorbatant ransom to be paid if the Director of the film, The Innocence of Muslims is killed.  We never take any action to block out that noise!  We only love making business deals with them and making fruitless attempts to appease them.  Please see the blocked  You Tube link below.  Take a look at the message that appears on the video:

A Pakistani government minister offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who kills the "Innocence of Muslims" filmmaker.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdjwS62F1ac&fb_source=message

If you double click on this link you will see the message that says that it cannot be viewed in your country.  So happy to have been able to read the headline!  At least even without the video we know what they are planning.  Yet the video is tangible evidence!  This is the "noise" they are afraid of, so they continue to block the social medias!  What does that mean for minorities in Pakistan that cannot share their videos  with the outside world?  Why can't they share?  Because hundreds of media sharing sites have been blocked by the current Muslim government of Pakistan!  Read all about it in the following link:

http://rachelboehm.com/?p=164

 Yet is perfectly acceptable for Pakistan  to be a country that is number one in viewing pornography sites.  Those sites are not heard of to be blocked yet any site that dares show the truth of current activities in the country is most definitely blocked!  Is this not unlike what the Nazis did to the Jews in Europe who could not reach the outside world to let people know what was happening to them?  In the mean time the doers of evil were presenting a false sense of security to the rest of the world that everything was just fine!  What is it about constructive criticism that frightens Muslims so much?  Why are they so afraid of truth?  The current Unites States President in office is ready to join the ranks of Muslims and block out any noise concerning the threat of  a nuclear Iran.  Please see the link below:



http://www.presstv.com/detail/2012/09/24/263249/israeli-call-for-red-line-just-noise-us/

It's OK for Muslims  to make the rules  that apply to everyone else which of course they are exempt from and this is not viewed as noise in order to be blocked!  Strange irony!  A people that claims to be a "peaceful" society continually makes needless noise by way of viable threats and terrorism!  Sounds a bit hypocritical  if you ask me.  Here is the noise  I would like to block out!  Let's block out the fact that Muslims are victims!  The truth is that in reality they are the perpetrators of the worst kind of terrorism and censorship  known to the international communities of the world!  They are so afraid to reveal the facts of what they do to others!  If they are not guilty of such noise than why are so afraid when movies or videos are shared!  Should the innocent have any need for fear?  Yet the Muslims are very afraid of a single shred of truth that may illuminate the world!  I say again, Let's block out the noise!  Each person can choose what they view or hear and what they say or share!  That is called Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Expression!  Are  we on our way to losing those freedoms in a country that takes pride in being the "Land of the Free?"  Well, the current President in Office seems to advocate for censorship!  Very strange coming from the supposed leader of the United States of America! After all blocking all the "noise", it seems in his attitude to be perfectly acceptable  in the wake of the greatest danger that has ever faced the USA , Israel, Europe and Asia.  Oh Yes!!!!  Let's block all the noise, shall we?

Zemira Eli Natan
Executive Director
International Unity for Equality

IS MULTICULTURALISM A THREAT OR A BLESSING TO THE ABORIGINALS ?

INTRODUCTION:

Culture has a very strong direct  effect on the society, it’s a ubiquitously consented truth.Why is culture important to a society ? This is not a small topic its impossible to explain in one single sentence.I realized the importance of culture when I went exterior from my homeland,ages ago when I was a student in undergraduate programme I used to pursue a part time job for a MNC. I worked with them for continuous 2 year 7 months.I used to go to various cities for that job company used to pay train fair,food,and a handsome money per event.Usually I used to get 1 event in month.So I was enjoying that as a college student with a fresh mind.Since my childhood, I am a good traveller & I visit place with an intention to know about dissimilar acculturations still now  I have the same outlook.Actually by birth I am a Bengali hindu I was born in the Indian state of west Bengal so I was wonted with my ethnic culture.Many readers of my blog will say what is new with this writeup, whatever you are saying these are quite normal things, yes I admit with them initially but later they will know the importance of ethnicity when they will read my whole write up. I was born in the muslim majority district, which is cognized as Murshidabad in west Bengal. So sooner or later if you follow our blog IUFE and some other blogs ( where I shared link of our blog ) you will know the vast experience what  I had with the outlanders in my homeland.Okay leave it now come to the point, Once I went to Bhubneswar the capital city of Orrisa State of Indian Union.

After finishing my work, there I got one full day to enjoy so I started to dig about the cultural difference of west Bengal & Orissa .I always respect the different ethnic culture when I go to a different place I don’t want to impose my beliefs on them rather than that I adapt with them & I consume myself to grasp their ethnic culture.I visited many places of Orissa & I ascertained huge difference of the oriyas & Bengalis though both state has hindu majority & both are controlled by the central govt of india. Not only that both state shares  borders with each other but an immense cultural variance is obtrusive between these two neighbors. This is the importance of ethnicity whether the immigrants accept this truth or not, truth will be admitted as truth not as lie.Firstly after finishing the work I went to a restaurant, I tried some ethnic foods those are not so well as per my tongue , but how can I say that they are bad and we are good, just right next to me an oriya person was staring at me & following my activities, I have a principle in my life I never waste food, I came from a very poor family, i was an occupant of a very remote village of west Bengal ,Now my family is a millionaire, I live my life in a lavish way but it was just a nightmare for me before 1997, so for me wasting a plate of food is like wasting one thousand bucks. Finally the oriya person asked me are you a Bengali ? I shake my head & said yes. He said why did you take oriya food though the restaurant provides Bengali foods, I said to him with utmost respect.Sir right now I am in Orissa so I am an oriya, I will respect oriya culture I will never try to penetrate my own culture on oriya people.He was so astonished he just left his chair,came and joined my table.we became friends for that certain time.That person was a govt employee working in healthcare sector in Orissa, he said the way you respect our culture most of the outlanders doesn’t he blamed the Biharis , the people of UP ( Uttar Pradesh, the largest state of india in terms of population ) also blamed the Bengalis. I asked him why do you hate them and consider them as aliens in your homeland. He said with red eye, that brother not only they come here but also they try to dominate us but we oriya  people  are quite concerned about this cultural ethnic ablutionary, so kept eye on it. He said most of the biharis , Upians after entering Orissa they work & establish here for years after years they don’t return to their homeland also they don’t adopt our food, language, and culture on the contrary they propagate their culture all the time. Finally what happens they transform a whole oriya dominating locality into their culture, so culturally the oriya people leaves the place & they take over our ancestral areas. Would you allow this to happen in your soil ? he asked this question to me I said no with plausive way.This same cancer multiculturalism is mocking the Danes in the Denmark, Swedish in Sweden, whole UK  is affected by this multiculturalism, Nederland is suffering for the Moroccans immigrants, The native Australians are suffering for the Turkish immigrants, Germany , USA, many European countries are suffering for the Turkish immigrants. We know the problem of ethnic people of France for the Algerians, not only these people entered France as intruders but also dominating the liberal politics of France. India is suffering for the illegal immigrants of Pakistan,Bangladesh in a heavy way.These immigrants arrogate a country as  guest refugees  and  finally attack the host country and transform it into their way. They don’t have minimum respect to   these host country’s constitution ,law, culture and structure they know only one thing how to promote their goals & convert the land in their way. Israel is suffering in the same way people from Syria, Palestine and many middle easterners enters & violates the Israeli interests. Though there are some exceptional cases we postulated from the history, sometimes multiculturalism is beneficial to a state. Take the example of The land of Opportunity USA , this  country is superpower since many decades.Just before the 1940’s it was not the superpower Why  did  they successfully snatched the position of superpower ? as they allowed immigration of skilled people, those who believes in democracy.They provided more opportunities to a skilled professional in their land with good money & awesome infrastructure.They got the result they increased their power more and more that’s why their land is known as the Land of Opportunity.We have to admit one truth that upto certain level multiculturalism is fruitful. I am explaining some points how far a country can support multiculturalism. 

 

HOW FAR A COUNTRY CAN ALLOW MULTICULTURALISM :

1)      Whenever  the migrants  will add value to the country’s growth will not be a burden for the country .

2)      Migrants should respect the natives as the progenitors of that soil & respect their culture with utmost care.

3)       Migrators   should integrate with the mainstreme culture of the natives not force them to believe in  their culture.

4)       Migrators should not disrespect the law, constitution, and rituals of the host country , if they have any problem they can leave and go back to their homeland.

5)      Migrators should not involve themselves in separatist movements, anti national activities which will harm the country’s interest.

6)      Migrators should not send all the earned money to their homeland , shall leave the host country after spending some long time there.

Specially in india I have seen some communities really became a value adder for our country like the Parsis, Tamils of srilanka,jews of bagdad, portugese of goa, Armenians of india, Bhutanese Hindu refugees, Myanmar Hindu Refugees  they entered in india with a limited population took the modern education & integrated with liberal mainstream culture of Indian Union. Being a native of india I never find anything wrong with this we can welcome more people like them who will come to india add value in this country’s growth & assimilate with us with their religious faiths. On the other hand we see that Bangladeshi  Muslims  enters india  for their own political goal to connect Bangladesh & Pakistan with a corridor through the mughalisthan project .How can I accept them as my fellow Indian brothers ? whose main aim is to dismantle this country’s  stability  by  changing  the demography of india.Even the Bangladeshi hindus they are also a big threat to Indian economy.Presently Bangladesh has more or less 30 million non muslims they always want to settle in india instead of demanding a separate state for procuring their self interests. In the same way Pakistan has near about 15 million non muslim population if they also demand to settle in india where shall we go , shall we all natives give all our assets to them and become destitute. This cant be a feasible solution, here I feel a huge pain.Many muslim country send a large no of migrants to a non muslim country & try to change that country’s politics by breaking the laws of that country. They give birth of uncountable no of babies, and perform various types of jihad to convert the natives into islam but still the international community allows them into their soils just because of maintaining the business tieups.I ask a question to the visitor of this blog Do you really think is it a good deed ? answer is a hell big no. The more it will happen the more regional movements will grow whther it is BODOLAND of assam , EDL ( English Defense League ) of England,SION ( stop islamization of nations ) ,Hindu Samhati ( West Bengal ).I don’t directly support the Ander’s Breivik but whether the migrants accept it or not it will grow more and more.More the migrants play with the local sentiments more they will have to suffer, it’s  like tit for tat. I give thanx to the dutch govt for Restricting the migration from arab nations. I also urg the British Govt to look the anti national migrants as a threat to their country & deport them from their English soil.

DEMERITS  OF OUTLANDERS AND MULTICULTURALISM :

• When populace try to win over other racism/ethnicity's/etc. for certain senses of superiority.
• From that come racial tensions and social tensions.
• When people don't recognize, they will misunderstand and make something bad out of it and start seeing others as lesser than them.
• People will begin to get persecuted and start being used as scapegoats.

 ( Tony Bamber Addressing People Against Multiculturalism in Sweden

in Annual Salem Demonstration  )

In a country there can be many cultures living side by side. This is due to countries opening up, air travel becoming cheaper and easier which have allowed more and more people to go to other countries. For instance, Britain has seen migrants from all over the world from all walks of life; students, doctors, engineers, information technology professionals, nurses and many others have come to Britain to live and work.This has allowed multi different cultures and ethnic groups to live together in a country like Britain. Britain has seen waves of migrants from all over the world; from Africa, India and other European countries. There are two aspects of this development. Firstly, a multi ethnic country can be good a country. This allows cultural diversity; people from different countries can contribute in their own way. For instance, Britain has a large Indian population and many of them are doctors. These Indian doctors have contributed significantly to the health of the country. Many work as consultants, general practitioners, researchers, all contributing to the health and welfare of Britain. Another example is Indian migrants from Africa have contributed to building businesses.Hence the positive aspects of various cultures in a country can contribute to the country’s social and economic development. Alternatively, if large groups of different cultures accumulate, in can cause social friction. The native population can see the immigrants as their competitors taking their jobs, houses, benefits etc. In addition, if some of these immigrants refuse to integrate, this can cause further social tension and civil unrest, in some cases riots.

Finally, I would like to mention that different cultures and ethnic groups living together have more social benefits than negative development. Britain is a prime example of such a society where many ethnic groups and cultures exist and live together. Britain has witnessed migration from various countries. In any city of Britain, one is able to see people from various ethnic groups living together. These groups have contributed to society in all aspects be it health, business, education or technology.

Britain is truly a multiethnic country. Rarely Britain has seen social unrest due to multiculturalism; this is not to say that tension cannot build up. Waves of immigrants are coming to Britain from Eastern European countries and people are now complaining about Britain’s ability to accommodate them all. It’s time that Britain policy makers take tough action and make immigration harder.

Heinz-Christian Strache, leader of the Austrian populist Freedom Party (FPO), was re-elected its president on June 18 in Graz.Who directly opposes immigration from muslim countries.

SOLUTION AND CONCLUSION OF MULTICULTURALISM :

1)      Mass deportation of illegal migrants from a civilized country.

2)      Formation of a state only for illegal and anti national migrants,  approved by United Nations where all civilized democratic countries will deport the burdensome population.

3)      Limiting the immigration to a certain stage so that it will not hamper the interests of the natives of a country.

4)      Whenever a migrant community produces threats to the indigenes, A state should have the authority to protect its Bhumiputras ( natives ).

5)      Every democratic civilized non muslim country should control the patrolling car at the border with an enemy nations so that they can check the infiltration otherwise that country’s  sovereignty will be under threat, a satellite state will control the country from outside.

6)      Natives should be always united together and govt should aware the natives so that they should not cooperate with the anti national people of that country.

7)      NATIVES, GOVT, EVERY INSTITUTION SHOULD OUTCAST THE ANTI NATIONAL PEOPLE WHO BECOMES A THREAT TO THE COUNTRY’S SOVEREIGNTY , WHO VIOLATES THE LAW AND ORDER OF THE COUNTRY, WHO DOES NOT FOLLOW ANY FAMILY PLANNING AND FORCE A PLACE TO HEAD TOWARDS A DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE.THOSE WHO VIOLATES NATIONAL INTERESTS THEY SHOULD BE STOPPED BY ANY MEANS.EVEN THE WAY MYANMAR IS SOLVING THEIR ILLEGAL MIGRATION PROBLEM THAT IS ALSO TO SOME EXTENT RIGHT.

The more extremist migrators will invade a civilized country we will see the rise of people like Tommy Robinson( England ,EDL ),Tapan Ghosh( Hindu Samhati,  west Bengal india ), Anders Breivik ( Norway ) , Terry Jones ( USA ) , Robert Spencer ( USA ) ,Geerth Wilders ( Nederlands ), Anders Gravers ( Denmark , SIOE ) , Ripon Dey and Gobindo Chandra Pramanick ( BNHGA, Bangldesh ) , P.Wathya Murthy( HINDRAF, Malayasia) , Zemira Eli Natan ( USA , IUFE) , Veerji Kohli ( Pakistan , IUFE)  and More.

Anders Breivik After The Decree of The Oslo Court .



Lastly i will end my article with this great sanskrit solka:

Yada Yada Hi Dharmasya
Glanir Bhavathi Bharatha

Abhyudhanama Dharmasya

Dhatatmanam Srijamyahan

Paritranaya Sadhunam

Vinashaya Cha Dushkrutam

Dharmasansthapanarthaya

Sambhavaami Yuge Yuge!!!

Attacks in USA due to 74 Min Comedy that "Offends Muslims".

Encouraging genocide is a crime. The UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide was signed in 1948 and fathered by Raphael Lemkin, a Jewish Polish lawyer who studied the genocide of the Armenians and invented the term in 1943 – “genos” meaning race or people and “cide” to kill. The Convention states that incitement “with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group” is illegal.

Let us take a look at what is happening in the USA as a result of anything that "offends Muslims".  The question is, what doesn't offend them.  They are offended by anything and everything that they can claim justification for their aggressive activity toward those who are non-Muslim.
In 539 BC, King Belshazzar of Babylon saw a dismembered hand-written four prophetic words on the wall. This "handwriting on the wall" was finally interpreted by the prophet Daniel as predicting the fall of the kingdom. He was right. Babylon fell to the Medes-Persians that very night.

Like the “handwriting on the wall” that Prophet Daniel had interpreted, there are four Arabic words, which could lead to submission of the entire world to Islam, if non-Muslims do not fully understand their meaning and implications. Those words are takiyya, tawriya, kitman, and muruna.

Each of these words describes a different style of deception used by Muslims when discussing Islam or their activities as Muslims. Muhammad famously said, “War is deceit.” (Bukhari, Vol. 4, Book 52, Number 268) The Quran boasts that Allah is the “master of all scheming” (Surah 13:42) and that he is “profound in his machinations” (Surah 8:30). Western civilizations are not accustomed to dealing with people, who have developed deception into an art form. Knowledge is power, and the best way to combat the Islamist agenda is to say, “We are wise to your shenanigans. Knock it off!”


Takiyya

Takiyya is defined as dissimulation about ones Muslim identity. It comes from the verse in the Quran that says, “Let believers not make friends with infidels in preference to the faithful – he that does has nothing to hope for from Allah – except in self-defense (illaa an-tattaqu minhum tuqah) (Surah 3:28). This “self-defense” justifies dissimulation. Islamic Sharia Law provides, “When it is possible to achieve an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible, and lying is obligatory if the goal is obligatory.” (Reliance of the Traveler, Para r8.2) Examples include lying to protect Islam or a Muslim.



Tawriya

Tawriya is defined as concealing, and it could be called “creative lying”. It is OK to break the intent of the oath, as long as you don’t break the letter of the oath. (Reliance of the Traveler, sections o19.1 and o19.5) How does this work? Suppose someone protests that Surah 1 of the Quran demeans Christians and Jews, because it is a supplication Muslims make to Allah seventeen times a day to keep them from the path of “those with whom God is angry” and “those who have lost their way”. A Muslim might respond, “Surah 1 never mentions Jews or Christians.” He is practicing tawriya, because while Surah 1 does not mention Jews and Christians by name, but he knows full-well that the words “those” refer to Jews and Christians.

Another example would be when a Muslim responds to your greeting of “Merry Christmas!” He might say, “I wish you the best.” In your mind, you think he has returned a Christmas greeting. In actuality, he has expressed his wish for you to convert to Islam; he wishes the best for you which, in his view, is becoming a Muslim.

Kitman

Kitman is characterized by someone telling only part of the truth. The most common example of this is when a Muslim says that jihad really refers to an internal, spiritual struggle. He is not telling “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”, as witnesses are sworn to do in U.S. courts. Often, kitman results in a gross distortion of the truth. In the example given, the Quran uses jihad and its derivatives 59 times. Of those, only 16 (27%) could be considered “internal” with no object as the target of the struggle based on the context of the surah.

Another common form of kitman is to quote only the few peaceful passages from the Quran, knowing full-well that that passage was later abrogated by a more militant, contradictory verse. Here is an example:

“There is no compulsion in religion” (Surah 2:256) Early Medina

“Are they seeking a religion other than Allah’s, when every soul in the heavens and earth has submitted to Him, willingly or by compulsion?” (Surah 3:83 Later Medina)

Another example:

“Permission to take up arms is hereby given to those who are attacked, because they have been wronged.” (Surah 22:39) Late Mecca

“When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere for them.” (Surah 9:5) Late Medina

Muruna

Muruna means using “flexibility” to blend in with the enemy or the surroundings. The justification for this kind of deception is a somewhat bizarre interpretation of Surah 2:106, which says, “If we abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten, We will replace it by a better one or similar.” Thus, Muslims may forget some of the commands in the Quran, as long as they are pursuing a better command. Muslims striving to advance Islam, therefore, can deviate from their Islamic laws in order to cause non-Muslims to lower their guard and place their trust in their Muslim counterpart.

At times, Muslims practice muruna in the same way a chameleon changes colors to avoid detection. Muslims will sometimes shave off their beards, wear western clothing, or even drink alcohol to blend in with non-Muslims. Nothing is more valuable these days to the Islamists than a blue-eyed Caucasian Muslim willing to engage in terrorism.

Another common way of using muruna is for a Muslim to marry a non-Muslim or to behave like a non-Muslim so their true agenda will not be suspected. The 9/11 hijackers visited strip clubs and bars during their off-times while taking classes in the U.S. to fly airplanes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the White House. Many Americans believe Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin, married Jewish Congressman Anthony Weiner at least in part to burnish her security credentials so she could infiltrate the highest levels of the Administration.

The implications of these highly-honed tactics of deception could be enormous for unassuming Western societies. Twenty years ago, psychologist Paul Ekman wrote an insightful book, “Telling Lies”, which demonstrated that people give off recognizable clues when they are practicing deceit. Their consciences cause them, involuntarily, to sweat or raise their voices or make other recognizable gestures. However, Dr. Ekman’s research was exclusively with people from Western cultures. Muslims, on the other hand, show no discernible signs when they are being deceitful because there is no feeling of guilt. In their minds they are doing exactly what Allah wants them to do to advance Islam. Because any Western person who has raised children knows almost intuitively when someone is lying, so they assume they can do that in all cases. Unfortunately, those same Western people can be easily duped by Islamic deceit because there are no tell-tale signs in the deceiver.

And this is how they view things:

Muslim Brotherhood Perspective on Embassy Attacks

On Wednesday, September 12th, the Muslim Brotherhood released its official statement regarding the attacks on the various embassies and the circumstances around those attacks.

“One and a half billion Muslims are subjected to humiliation and abuse in the person of their leader, Mohammed, the Messenger of God, the Prophet of Islam, of mercy and goo...

d tidings for the whole world.

We denounce abuse of all Messengers of God, Prophets and Apostles, and condemn this heinous crime. The peoples and governments of the Muslim world have every right to condemn, with all peaceful and legal means, this new violation and heinous attack, and to take appropriate action to deter repeats of such acts of barbaric aggression.”

Hopefully, this article will be a wake-up call to the unsuspecting infidels. Trust but verify – as was an old American strategy in dealing with potentially hostile parties – is the way to go in dealing with Islamists.

Just making a comment against islam incites them!  Take a look at this link:


http://www.valleycentral.com/news/story.aspx?id=801919&fb_comment_id=fbc_433199226726211_4684624_433239263388874#f313c633f9dee9a

Now lets us exmaine the attacks.  Here is a notable one worth viewing.  A US Senator is dragged from his car.  He is raped before he is murdered  while they shout, " Allahu Akbar!", yet we are told by Muslims that they are a "Religion of Peace"  Please see the link below:


http://youtu.be/lRBl11SRtUk

Is this there example of what it means to be a religion of peace?

http://youtu.be/RbD_ghudm0w

 How about this one?  A young Jewish couple from New Jersey are returning to their home after prayers at their Synagogue, the Jewish house of worship.  They are killed by extremists just for the sake of being Jewish!  What kind of religion of peace endorces such violence?  Moreover, this violence against any non-Muslim  is clearly unjustified!  Where is the justice from the International Human Rights agencies to protect these and many more victims that we are not hearing about in our medias?  Where is the action behind the words?  International victims are crying out for justice all over the world!  There is silence from the UN  , why  because their membership is predominantly represented by Muslim countries.  Surely this is a clear explanation as to why so many applications in regard to so many violations of Human Rights go unheeded.    Please see the link below on the attack in New Jersey:



http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/160061

And this one that occured in France:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/160091

Attacks such as this in Europe  take Jews back to a time when the Nazis looted and burned everything they owned.  We remember this as Kristallnacht , the night of broken glass where Jewish shops were destroyed by Nazi Youth and Stormtroopers.  Muslims now use fire a far more consuming weapon.  The fact that this rears its head Europe is a painful tragedy and horrible reoccurance!


There are countless number of similar  attacks. They are never mentioned in the media.  To find the record of them, we search carefully even on medias that are not local!  Why does the enemy hide?  Why can they not face truth?  When will we see an end to this behavior?  Is this "attacking Islam"  like they claim?  It said that a picture speaks a thousand words!  Constructive Critisism is always the intention here.  We do not discriminate  but we certainly will question acts of violence and human rights violations.  This will be be our task until we see a positive change. A final note.  For a 74 minute comedy  about Mohammed to incite such acts and many other acts of violence against non-Muslims is questionable.  A movie does not have to be watched.  It can be ignored and most certainly does not possess that much power to offend so deeply that it could cause someone to kill over it.  Certainly Jews and countless other victims of the Holocaust did not kill over Nazi Propaganda.  Nor should Muslims be incited to violence over a humorous movie.  Just something to think about.


Zemira Eli Natan
Executive Director
International Unity for Equality